BEYOND THE BRAIN BLOG
  • Blog
  • Author
  • Resources
    • Bookstore
    • Downloads
    • Provider Tools
    • Patient Resources
    • Speakers & Talks
    • Ketogenic Diet
  • For Patients
  • Contact

No Need for Blood: Nine Alternatives to the Antidepressant Debate

1/25/2014

0 Comments

 
SOURCE: Psychiatric Times
January 23, 2014 | James Phelps, MD
Picture



At the recent International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) meeting, 2 experts debated the role of antidepressants in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Both sides of the debate presented rational interpretations of existing literature (thus the jest about more blood). Both speakers agreed there is very little evidence for the efficacy of antidepressants in the treatment of bipolar disorder, particularly for longer-term use. They disagreed regarding evidence for the capacity of antidepressants to exacerbate bipolar disorder. The risk of inducing manic symptoms was their main focus, although one should also consider risk of inducing mixed states and the risk of “mood destabilization,” ie, inducing cycling such that more mood-stabilizing medications are required than would be needed without the antidepressant. For all of these risks, there remains room for debate.

Yet such debate may be moot. Look closely at the benefit to risk ratio for treatment of manic episodes in bipolar depression. Imagine a competition, based on this ratio, between antidepressant modalities. In this competition, any treatment that can leap over the bar of efficacy can be compared on the basis of its potential to exacerbate bipolar disorder. If the efficacy bar is set close to zero, which both speakers agreed appears to be the case for antidepressants, then virtually any treatment with evidence of antidepressant effects in some form of depression can be considered for the treatment of bipolar depression. The competition comes down to evidence of exacerbation and other adverse effects and risks—not efficacy.

>> Read the rest of the article HERE


Summary

This antidepressant debate, however rational, was moot before it began. Clinicians have at least 9 alternatives to antidepressants, all of which have as much evidence for efficacy in bipolar depression as antidepressants do. All 9 alternatives have less risk of inducing hypomania/mania, and at least 5 have very little risk at all—and most of them have additional benefits. The pharmacotherapies have significant risks and warrant careful discussion with patients and individualized decision making. But for the benefit to risk ratio for mania, there is no need for further debate—or blood.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture


    USEFUL LINKS

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    December 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    August 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013


    following

    Picture
Creative Commons License
Copyright 2013
Beyond the Brain Blog
Beyond the Brain is a not-for-profit website. We appreciate your support to continue providing more content and tools.    Donate today!
BLOG  |  AUTHOR |  RESOURCES |  FOR PATIENTS |  CONTACT  |  SUPPORT BTB